top of page
Search

Priority #1 is being understood

I talk a lot about reducing text because overcommunication is a huge problem.

I have thousands of real examples where I cut text by 50-80% without impacting content or tone. 

But, sometimes using more words is better. 

Your #1 priority is being understood. 

Your #2 priority is being as brief as possible.

If more words means more clarity, use more words. 

 

If 100% of your audience clearly understands what you mean when you say "collective impact", it's fine as is. 

If less than 100% understand it, you have 2 options:

1. Choose a different set of words to describe what you mean. If you're struggling you can ask AI to provide 10 possible ways to simply explain "collective impact". 

2. Continue to use "collective impact" and also include a simple description of what you mean.

 

Being understood by everyone isn't always easy. It requires empathy, awareness, and practice. 

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Transparency builds trust

I saw a letter from a school superintendent that said, "I visited a number of schools last week."  How would you interpret that? 5 schools? 10? I assumed they visited 2 schools and were hoping I would

 
 
 
Sample AI Policy

I recently wrote about the importance of having an AI policy that your team can clearly explain in 30 seconds.  People need clarity. Are they expected to use it a lot, a little, or not at all? When? W

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page